Curbing overcapacity shipbuilding companies to accelerate transformation and reshuffle

The issue of overcapacity in the shipbuilding industry has long been recognized by market analysts. Experts predict that global shipbuilding capacity will exceed 50% in the next three years, while China’s current utilization rate is only 75%, significantly below the international average. The Equipment Department of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, led by Director Shu Min, has highlighted the growing challenges facing the sector. With more than 800 shipping companies in China—40 times the number of South Korean firms—the industry is undergoing a major reshuffle. Many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are at risk of being eliminated as competition intensifies. In response to this crisis, the State Council released the "Guiding Opinions on Resolving the Contradictions of Serious Overcapacity in Production Capacity," addressing key sectors including steel, cement, electrolytic aluminum, flat glass, and ships. The global shipping market has remained sluggish since the financial crisis, with new ship orders falling short of demand. This has led to declining prices and increased overcapacity, pushing China's shipbuilding industry into a downturn. According to public data from 2012, the utilization rates for these industries were all below international standards, highlighting the severity of the problem. Analysts suggest that overcapacity is not just a Chinese issue but a global one. In 2012, global new ship orders totaled 46.68 million DWT, and by September of this year, they had already reached 83.96 million DWT. Experts warn that global shipbuilding capacity could surpass 50% in the coming years. To address this, the State Council also issued the "Implementation Plan for Accelerating Structural Adjustment and Promoting Transformation and Upgrading of the Shipbuilding Industry (2013–2015)." This plan includes measures such as retiring old vessels and promoting mergers and acquisitions to improve industry concentration. Shu Min reported that efforts to curb overcapacity have made progress. The total shipbuilding capacity has stabilized, and corporate consolidation has accelerated. Some smaller firms have either transformed or exited the market, leading to a more rational industrial layout. According to Shao Heping from Norway’s Plato Co., many private companies entered the shipbuilding sector during its peak, securing large orders. However, after 2007, their performance declined sharply and has yet to recover. He noted that some shipyards are now operating at a loss just to stay afloat. Many SMEs remain in a state of uncertainty, hoping for a market rebound. Shu Min urged those waiting for recovery to consider exiting the market early to avoid further losses. With over 800 shipping companies, he warned that not all will survive. To control new entrants, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology introduced the "Standard Conditions for the Shipbuilding Industry." These requirements cover production facilities, technology, quality assurance, and environmental protection. Non-compliant companies will be excluded from the sector. Additionally, the government plans to prioritize credit support for compliant enterprises, encouraging a more sustainable and competitive industry. As the sector faces restructuring, experts emphasize the need for mergers, technological upgrades, and diversification. Some companies are shifting toward marine engineering equipment, a field seen as promising. Others are focusing on green technologies, as fuel efficiency becomes a key concern for shipowners. While not all firms can transition to offshore projects, those with specialized capabilities may still find opportunities. Green ships are also gaining traction, with buyers increasingly prioritizing energy-efficient designs. For China’s shipping industry to revive, it needs both government support and internal transformation. Strengthening financing, insurance, and high-value services will be crucial. At the same time, companies must invest in innovation, professional development, and operational improvements to build long-term competitiveness. In conclusion, the path forward for China’s shipbuilding industry lies in restructuring, upgrading, and embracing new markets. Only through sustained effort and strategic adaptation can the sector regain its former strength and secure a sustainable future.

Grinding Heads

Grinding head is a kind of small handle grinding tools, used in electric mills, hanging mills, hand electric drills. There are many kinds of diamond grinding head, ceramic grinding head, rubber grinding head, diamond grinding head, emery cloth grinding head.

Ceramic grinding head: grain size sand (generally brown corundum, white corundum, chrome corundum, silicon carbide) sintered by ceramic binder, with a metal handle in the center. Mainly grinding all kinds of metal, for grinding the inner wall of aperture, mold correction. Rubber grinding head: fine sand is synthesized by rubber binder for the polishing of mould

Diamond grinding head: A kind of stone material, ceramic materials and other non-metallic materials of grinding tools, especially involving a with diamond alloy grinding tools for grinding body, it includes substrate and a mill body, in which several mill body clearance to fixed to the substrate, the grinding surface of the grinding head grinding body also set a clearance, among them, the substrate is best by a certain toughness of adhesive materials, The grinding body is preferably made of diamond alloy material. The utility model has the advantages of high grinding performance, simple manufacturing and low cost, high grinding quality and being suitable for large-scale grinding

Grinding Heads,Cbn Sharpening Stone,Brazing Diamond Drilling Tool,Flexible Polyurethane Grinding Head

Henan Jinlun Superhard Material Co., Ltd , https://www.jinlunsuperhard.com