The real economy can't do this black pot. Who should back it?

Abstract No matter whether it is virtual or physical, it can't be labeled as a prejudice. The real economy is going downhill, and it can't be judged from a single perspective that the virtual economy is the culprit. In a rational market, they are a whole that is compatible with symbiosis. Any country with developed economy, virtual economy...
No matter whether it is virtual or physical, it can't be labeled as a prejudice. The real economy is going downhill, and it can't be judged from a single perspective that the virtual economy is the culprit. In a rational market, they are a whole that is compatible with symbiosis. In countries with developed economies, the virtual economy is also extremely developed.
Recently, I saw that Ma Yunzong’s post-quiet remarks about the opposition between virtual and entity were quite unexpected. This may be a aftermath of the call by the Chairman of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, Liu Shiyu, to the “barbarians” in the capital market, because the capital market is mostly The virtual economy is said to be "barbarians". It is as if the real economy is being ruined by the virtual economy. Nature attracts people's right and wrong judgments between the virtual and the real, and also triggers the whole society's denunciation of the virtual economy.
In fact, any developed economy is inseparable from the virtual economy. The virtual economy is a supplement to the real economy rather than hostility. Like the United States, the financial industry is so developed, and finance is a virtual economy. Even if the United States experiences a subprime crisis in financial over-derivatives, The virtual economy has been hit harder than ever, but because the physical industries such as the US manufacturing industry are generally global, their physical economy is limited. The emergence of this crisis also provides the United States with an opportunity to explore the causes of the crisis and find out the virtual Serve institutional loopholes in the entity to avoid the next tragedy of the same kind. Although the United States also opposes the virtual economy and the occupation of Wall Street, it is only a civil protest. The government has solved this problem by strengthening the supervision of finance.
In China, the decline in the real economy is not to try to find institutional problems, but to always find a scapegoat and attribute one problem to another. It seems that finding a venting window for failure can be solved perfectly. How to improve the virtual economy to find out the problem of the real economy. For example, if the ship is sailing in the sea, it is a question of the captain or a problem of water and water? The sailor just listened to the dispatch and stepped on the job to do his job. If there is a heading problem, he can't blame the sailor. It is clear that the captain's ability has gone wrong.
This situation is the same as the virtual economy and the real economy. The virtual economy is only a tool to provide funds for the real economy in production operations. It is only because some people find that tool speculation is more profitable than producing products, so everyone is too lazy to Going to production and becoming a virtual tool to rush to speculate, who is wrong? It must be that the rules have been made wrong, which makes the virtual and physical fires incompatible.
There is a phenomenon that is very common in China, that is, real estate speculation. People also classify the real estate industry into a virtual economy. In fact, the definition of virtual economy is morphologically virtual rather than physical, with the value symbol as the transaction object, not the real thing. For the transaction object. Real estate is physical, so real estate should also be classified as a real economy.
However, real estate is discovered by smart Chinese people and has financial attributes. If the second suite can make a listed company sell housing and protect the shell, the real estate will be completely neglected and the virtual function will be used as a virtual tool to speculate. Virtual economy, so real estate has two attributes, both the real economy and the virtual economy. On December 16, 2016, the Central Economic Work Conference proposed that the house was used to live. This signal is undoubtedly the government's need to solve the virtual function of the house.
Now let's take a look at the motive behind Ma Yun and Zong Qinghou's virtual and physical disputes. The reason why Zong Qinghou insisted that Ma Yun’s Ali Group Company is a virtual enterprise, because Ma Yun’s Taobao Alibaba is in the form of a network. This kind of invisible does not make people feel that they are in line with the virtual positioning. So Zong Qinghou said Ma Yun’s enterprise It is virtual, but this kind of dispute is obviously intended to fall into the "unjust" of Ma Yun. In the current policy space, there is a trend that is not conducive to the development of virtual economy. Once it is identified as virtual, it may be classified as restricted. Enterprises have extremely bad expectations for future development.
Therefore, Ma Yun is also trying to break free from this accusation and prevent the "brace" from being trapped by inexplicable policies. Ma Yun’s words are also meaningful. Ma Yun has a paragraph: not that China’s real economy is not working, but “your” The real economy is not going to work. In 2016, the total sales of Alibaba platform exceeded RMB 3 trillion at the beginning of the year, indicating that the real economy has found a new direction through the transformation of circulation through the Internet. It is necessary to develop such a new real economy before there is a way to face tomorrow.
The meaning of Ma Yun’s sentence is to position itself as “new real economy”, which means that the difference is from the old real economy, which is different from the real economy that Zong Qing’s products can see and feel. So is the formulation of this "new real economy" correct? Ma Yun’s “new” is a new way of increasing employment and employment in society, creating more than 30 million jobs, including upstream and downstream manufacturing, wholesale, finance, logistics, service providers and other industries and jobs.
Tens of thousands of merchants on the Taobao and Tmall platforms have created huge economic growth and boosted domestic demand. And some virtual economy only benefits a small number of people. For example, stocks benefit from behind-the-scenes operations, and a small number of people can benefit from it. It is unimaginable for Ma’s enterprises to make people rich in such a large number of employment opportunities. It is a channel to combine countless entities, so Ma Yun positioned himself as a "new real economy", I think this statement is a bit reasonable.
But neither the virtual nor the entity can be labeled with prejudice. The real economy is going downhill, and the virtual economy cannot be judged from a single point of view. The real economy in China has a lot of reasons, such as high taxes and long political heads. Too many administrative departments and monopolization of resource allocation by state-owned enterprises are of course inseparable from the virtual speculation of various energy-intensive capitals. Therefore, the real economy is pushed to the downward channel under the combination of various factors, but among these reasons. Because the virtual economy is irrelevant to the reform of the political system, it is relatively easy to solve. However, this solution is also the most vulnerable to disrupting the market order. The maturity of the virtual economy has a lot to do with the development of the market. In a rational market, They are a whole that is compatible with symbiosis. In countries with developed economies, the virtual economy is also extremely developed. Just like the United States and Japan, the virtual economy has played a role as a “barometer” of the market.
Therefore, no matter how Ma Yun and Zong Qinghou are opposed, government policy makers should start from formulating rules and introduce the water of virtual economy into the real economy to serve the entity. Just like the banks in China, the banking industry is the representative of the virtual economy. It is born for the real economy. Because the operation of the bank is controlled by countless rules, the bank is a domesticated virtual economy with high security. Therefore, the battle between virtual and entity is a dispute of rules, not a confrontation between you and me.
(The author of this article: Senior financial commentator, long-term work in the financial industry.)

Cake Mold

Silicone Cake Moulds,Silicone Cupcake Molds,Mini Cake Pans,Dinosaur Cake Pan

YANGJIANG VOSSEN INDUSTRY AND TRADE CO.,LTD , https://www.cnvossen.com